Registration of intellectual rights to the software solutions
Selection of deposited materials
Search in the registries by the trademarks to identify any obstacles to the issuance of a title of protection
Submission of materials, payment of fees, preparation and submission of responses to the inquiries from the examination department
Our patent attorneys have experience of work as the Rospatent (Federal Service for Intellectual Property) experts
During the first consultation, we will explain how to protect intellectual property
We have extensive experience in various fields of science and commerce
We reserve the right to refuse to provide services after the preliminary verification of the computer program name or databases in the trademark base. In this case, it is subject to return.Request
|Patenting of a computer program as an invention and interfaces as the industrial designs||Request|
|Registration of transactions with the computer programs in Rospatent (Federal Service for Intellectual Property)||Request*|
|Amendment of the register and certificate||Request*|
The works that are not listed shall be agreed individually.
*The amounts of fees are not included in the indicated cost.
Leave a message and we will contact you in the closest time!
Moscow, Osenniy Bul'var, 16, korp. 2
The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation introduced uncertainty into the legal practice of registering trademarks, deciding that Rospatent may refuse to register if, in the opinion of the expert of the Federal Institute for Industrial Property, the designation indicated can be perceived as a type of goods.
The resolution clarifies the procedure for determining jurisdiction of disputes arising from the fourth part of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the procedure for resolving disputes arising from agreements referred to in this part of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, and explains the procedure for resolving disputes related to the protection of intellectual property rights and other issues relating to copyright and intellectual property.
The use of keywords (phrases) identical or confusingly similar to another person’s means of personalization, taking into account the purpose of such use, by an advertiser in a contextual advertisement on the Internet as a criterion for its displaying can be recognized as an act of unfair competition.