Patent office

Keeping its own patent office is an irrational expense item even for most medium-sized enterprises. However, as practice shows, applying for a one-time service to register rights to the results of intellectual activity often has bad consequences since at the stage of protecting its rights, the copyright holder learns that the title does not contain the required amount of legal protection or does not take into account the nuances of his business. A remote patent office is a profitable and efficient collaboration model. The cost of services is formed on the basis of the following conditions:

The advantage of remote support is constant and full-fledged work with the customer, which allows you to thoroughly study the business, most aspects related to intellectual property, and accordingly offer perfect for your solutions to the tasks, taking into account development plans, interests of business owners, and tax optimization.

Contacts


info@primsys.ru

Moscow, Osenniy Bul'var, 16, korp. 2

News


The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation decided to complicate the protection of intellectual rights that a brand is not subject to registration if it can be taken as a designation of a certain type of goods.

The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation introduced uncertainty into the legal practice of registering trademarks, deciding that Rospatent may refuse to register if, in the opinion of the expert of the Federal Institute for Industrial Property, the designation indicated can be perceived as a type of goods.

The Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation has prepared new explanations of the application practice of the provisions of the fourth part of the Civil Code for the courts.

The resolution clarifies the procedure for determining jurisdiction of disputes arising from the fourth part of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the procedure for resolving disputes arising from agreements referred to in this part of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, and explains the procedure for resolving disputes related to the protection of intellectual property rights and other issues relating to copyright and intellectual property.

A trademark becomes a panacea for unscrupulous competitors on the Internet.

The use of keywords (phrases) identical or confusingly similar to another person’s means of personalization, taking into account the purpose of such use, by an advertiser in a contextual advertisement on the Internet as a criterion for its displaying can be recognized as an act of unfair competition.