We advise on the intellectual property issues and determine the most appropriate object of rights for a patent acquisition.
We conduct an information search and identify any obstacles to the patent acquisition, offer options for eliminating any barriers to patenting.
We prepare the files and materials and submit an application, pay any fees, respond to the expert’s requests from Rospatent (Federal Service for Intellectual Property), the Eurasian Patent Office and patent offices of other countries.
We receive a patent decision, verify the correctness of information entered into the patent, receive and transfer the patent to the customer, provide recommendations on further work with the patented solution.
Our patent attorneys have experience of work as the Rospatent (Federal Service for Intellectual Property) experts
During the first consultation, we will explain how to protect intellectual property
We have extensive experience in various fields of science and commerce
Registration and submission of an application in 48 hours
The term for obtaining the final expert’s decision is 2-6 months from the date of submission
|Preparation and submission of a Eurasian application and patenting in the CIS countries||Request|
|Preparation of a draft patent claim/utility model based on the files and materials provided (separately as a service)||Request|
|Conduction of a patent search to determine compliance of one solution with the patentability conditions (14 business days and more)||Request|
|Introduction of a claim into the invention formula that is absent in the formula previously proposed by the applicant and accepted for consideration||Request|
|Amendment of applications||Request|
|Extension of the term for responding to the expert’s request for each month of extension||Request|
|Preparation, submission of a response to the expert’s request on the results of the declared decision compliance verification with the legal requirements||Request|
|Restoration of the deadline for submission of documents or additional materials defaulted by the applicant at the expert’s request||Request|
|Early publication of information relating to the application||Request|
|Republication of a patent||Request|
|Acquisition of a duplicate patent||Request|
|Amendments to the application documents in the case of transfer of the right for patent acquisition||Request|
|Amendments to the register of information relating to the patent holder, the inventor, the correspondence address, corrections of evident and technical errors (for each amendment relating to 1 patent)||Request|
|Amendments to the patent in terms of information relating to the patent holder, the inventor, the correspondence address, corrections of evident and technical errors||Request|
|Patent maintenance/If there are more than 10 pcs. in the order, monitoring of payment terms is included in the price||Request/Request|
The works that are not listed shall be agreed individually.
*The amounts of fees are not included in the indicated cost.
**We will help you to get tax benefits up to 90%.
Leave a message and we will contact you in the closest time!
Moscow, Osenniy Bul'var, 16, korp. 2
The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation introduced uncertainty into the legal practice of registering trademarks, deciding that Rospatent may refuse to register if, in the opinion of the expert of the Federal Institute for Industrial Property, the designation indicated can be perceived as a type of goods.
The resolution clarifies the procedure for determining jurisdiction of disputes arising from the fourth part of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the procedure for resolving disputes arising from agreements referred to in this part of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, and explains the procedure for resolving disputes related to the protection of intellectual property rights and other issues relating to copyright and intellectual property.
The use of keywords (phrases) identical or confusingly similar to another person’s means of personalization, taking into account the purpose of such use, by an advertiser in a contextual advertisement on the Internet as a criterion for its displaying can be recognized as an act of unfair competition.